In the 2016 US election (which was itself somewhat like a game of ‘Cards Against Humanity‘), candidate Hilary Clinton was accused of playing the ‘woman card’ by rival Donald Trump. In reaction, her campaign actually produced such a card. It boasted the dubious ‘benefits’ of lower wages, More expensive health care. No family leave, and ‘limited access to your own reproductive rights’. (Arguably no family leave is a circumstance that affects men as much as women. Framing it as a women’s issue only worsens the burden).
These cards were sold at $5 to fund Clinton’s campaign. Ironically, this resulted in Clinton literally playing the ‘woman card’ in her fundraising. But (aside from campaign funding) does it actually pay to play the ‘woman card’ in a financial sense?